Go Back   Data Center, Colocation, Cloud Computing, Storage, Dedicated Servers Forums > General DataCenter Discussion Forum > Data center general discussion and solution

Reply

 

Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 04-19-2007, 11:24 AM
KenB's Avatar
KenB KenB is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
With running circuits at 80%, you should not have an issue with overloading a circuit unless someone were to plug in a massive shop vac in to your power strip
A great topic! Here in the US, many data centers (ours included) are replacing 120V NEMA services with IEC style receptacles at 208V for power connections to critical equipment, in part to discourage people from using rack power for tools and appliances. Clear labeling helps protect personnel and equipment in these situations. This issue will become more important as 400V to the racks becomes popular.

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-24-2007, 09:54 PM
Rmgill Rmgill is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
The debate of whether or not to use a fuse of a circuit breaker is kind of unsettling in a forum such as this. A properly ran datacenter should have capacity planning methods put in place to mitigate the risk of overloading a circuit. You should never exceed 80% capacity on a circuit. With running circuits at 80%, you should not have an issue with overloading a circuit unless someone were to plug in a massive shop vac in to your power strip to do some cleanup; in which case, a circuit breaker would be ideal because you would want to just be able to hit the reset button on the strip instead of replace a fuse.
There's planning, Bad planning, Murphy and then...



Murphy re-enacarnated as one of your co-workers.



I've had a co-worker plug a device in of their own volition through labels saying "circuit full do not plug in here".

I've had a co-worker plug a device in and make contact with a system rack slide at the same time. BZZZT

I have had a co-worker stand on an Automatic Transfer Switch, thus grounding out the high voltage contacts, tripping BOTH circuits and vaporizing the contacts for most of the high voltage traces.

One cannot plan for all problems nor can one prevent all problems. That's why breakers are re-setable and fuses can be replaced relatively easily. Used to be things had fusible links or just burst into flames (or exploded).
__________________
CNN Internet Technologies
Data Center Manager
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-19-2007, 04:25 PM
FrankB FrankB is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NOVA
Posts: 5
Default

We have just recently started using the Server Tech 60 AMP 3 phase power strip for our blade deployments. Before that we were using the APC 7898 strips. We also use the APC 7894, 7841 strips as well.

Breaker versus fuses could go either way IMO. There are other factors that need to be considered. In order to use the Servertech strip we had to use a 30" wide cabinet. That strip is considerably deeper than the APC strip and we needed the additional room of the wider cabinet to reseat power supplies and network modules in the blade chassis.

We also like the ability to monitor the Servertech strips with only 1 IP address, adde to that the ability to get temperature without another piece of hardware.

Long story short, for our blade application the Servertech was the better strip. We are still deploying plenty of cabinets though with the APC strips.
__________________
DC Manager

mailto:ftbutler@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Member Area



Data Center Industry Daily News


Cloud and Dedicated Hosting


Sponsors Managed Servers Sponsored by DedicatedNOW.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.