08-18-2008, 12:59 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 121
|
|
HP Vs Dell VS IBM servers
There are many servers out there. If you compre HP/DELL/IBM, which one will be the best server to run heavy financial application?
Thanks,
Juan
|
08-20-2008, 10:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 33
|
|
I think your decision should be based on the hardware requirements of the applications rather than on the brand of server.
Find out the hardware specs that the application needs in order to run efficiently then base your decision on that.
|
08-25-2008, 11:57 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 50
|
|
I think IBM is the best among all these. It comes with light path technology so there are no problems at the time of minor failures.
|
09-09-2008, 07:29 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1
|
|
We can decide which one performing best cause thay have many diffrent working methodology.
yeh but they are working good at their place...
|
09-26-2008, 02:24 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 38
|
|
I am a huge fan of all of HP's products. Not only do I use thier servers, I use their home computers too. I have never been a big fan of IBM or Dell. Especially Dell.
|
09-26-2008, 05:03 AM
|
|
Leader
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 56
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by taki
I am a huge fan of all of HP's products. Not only do I use thier servers, I use their home computers too. I have never been a big fan of IBM or Dell. Especially Dell.
|
I am curious in you resentment of Dell Servers, any big reasons?
|
10-01-2008, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 967
|
|
We also use HP's servers and never had any issues. We have more than 4K+ servers. Also, they are working with Intel to provde better products.
|
10-03-2008, 02:04 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by molly00000
I think IBM is the best among all these. It comes with light path technology so there are no problems at the time of minor failures.
|
i work at reynolds and reynolds and all of our servers in the field are ibm's now, and i have to say the light path is pretty sweet. The only thing i would avoid are the ibm x305 servers. their 4th system fans SUCK. but luckily they are useless even when they work. big thumbs up for the 306m 245 and 246 and the new 3250 servers are pretty kick a$$ as well... personally i build my servers from the ground up, except for one which is a dell 2650 and i have no complaints about it
|
01-28-2009, 03:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 97
|
|
We have always used HP servers and were fully satisfied. I think IBM servers also do well but i got some bad feedback about dell servers.
|
01-31-2009, 05:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 33
|
|
HP- Ok for most midrange apps
IBM- mid to upper range, DB intensive apps
Dell- naeh...Seen too many die...
Sun- Very good in special apps, their new X64 Servers are amazing, great for hosting
Appro- High Performance Cluster? Cloud Computing? You got it!
__________________
abthost.com - Litespeed powered Hosting!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:31 PM.
|
Member Area
Cloud and Dedicated Hosting
|
