Go Back   Data Center, Colocation, Cloud Computing, Storage, Dedicated Servers Forums > Server Rack / SAN/NAS Storage Forum > Network and Telecom Forum

Reply

 

Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-13-2004, 11:11 AM
SiteSouth SiteSouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 132
Send a message via AIM to SiteSouth
Default Extreme Networks' Summit48si

Any one using the Extreme Networks' Summit48si. I am looking at those and the Cisco 3550. Just wondering your experiences.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2004, 02:23 PM
whcdavid's Avatar
whcdavid whcdavid is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 901
Default

Hi SiteSouth,

Can you tell me the purpose of the switches need. It all depends on when you need. If you tell me what exactly you like to do then we can recommend which is good for your needs.

Any expert here, can you answer for him?.

Thanks
David.K
__________________
WebHostingChat ( Web Hosting Forum)
DatacenterSearch (Find your Datacenter)
YOU FAIL ONLY WHEN YOU FAIL TO TRY

Last edited by whcdavid; 10-13-2004 at 02:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2004, 03:34 PM
tgeorgiev
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

are you going to use it for L2 or L3 switching?
That is an very important detail in considering what kind/brand of switch to choose.
What kind of interfaces you will need? ATM, fiber ?

If I was you, I would choose Extreme. The price per port/Mpps is much lower than Cisco and they are on the market for years. In my past work I had a BlackDiamond Extreme core switch running without any problem.
One of the "problems" Summit have is that there is full-duplex control only on the Gbit interfaces. but this is not an issue at all.
They are really very stable.
Even if you have no clue with Extreme management/config interface, if you have general experience with switches and/or Cisco CLI you will migrate very easily. The CLI is very close and intuitive, much a cisco-like style.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2004, 03:51 PM
SiteSouth SiteSouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 132
Send a message via AIM to SiteSouth
Default

I'll probably use it for L2 but it would be nice to know it can handle the all the L3 stuff should our situation change. I really hate buying gear two times to do the same basic job.

Ideally these would replace all of our 2924s and act as the primary switches for our colo clients. Thus the need for rate limiting and VLANs.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2004, 05:11 AM
FHDave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am using Extreme Summit 48i and 48si. Have used Extreme Summit 48 in the past. Very good routing switch. The 48i and 48si has ACL support, very handy when to filter packets (when you got DOSed, for example). They can also support OSPF, BGP, etc. But for advanced routing, I would recommend you buying a router.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-23-2004, 07:41 AM
Mesonix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello,
The Cisco 3550-48-SMI/EMI is a good switch. However, if your going to go with one then get the EMI. You could always pickup the SMI alot cheaper then the EMI and then just pay for the software upgrade.

Never had any experiences with the 48i but, I can tell you in our network we're currently using the Cisco 3550-48-EMI and can get a really good pricing on both the SMI/EMI.

If your looking for a router then I would recommend going with a Juniper M5, M10, M20, as it really depends on your traffic needs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-23-2004, 04:48 PM
FHDave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

For router, instead of M5, I would recommend M7i. It's Juniper new line of product (together with M10i) and it's really affordable. A base M7i comes with either 2FE or 1GE. I would say a new M7i (with 2FE) is cheaper than used M5 with 2FE PIC. Not to mentione, when you buy used Juniper, it will take thousands of dollars to have the router recertified.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-23-2004, 08:59 PM
Mesonix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FHDave
For router, instead of M5, I would recommend M7i. It's Juniper new line of product (together with M10i) and it's really affordable. A base M7i comes with either 2FE or 1GE. I would say a new M7i (with 2FE) is cheaper than used M5 with 2FE PIC. Not to mentione, when you buy used Juniper, it will take thousands of dollars to have the router recertified.
Hello,
I do recommend the M7i over the M5 as we will be using the M7i in our network. However, you can get a Juniper M5 with 4 GigE for a decent price from what I have seen.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-23-2004, 09:13 PM
whcdavid's Avatar
whcdavid whcdavid is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 901
Default

Hi,

Does Juniper Routers mainly used for disctribution level?. I mean is it directly connected to backbone?.

Thanks
David.K
__________________
WebHostingChat ( Web Hosting Forum)
DatacenterSearch (Find your Datacenter)
YOU FAIL ONLY WHEN YOU FAIL TO TRY
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-23-2004, 10:25 PM
FHDave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mesonix
Hello,
I do recommend the M7i over the M5 as we will be using the M7i in our network. However, you can get a Juniper M5 with 4 GigE for a decent price from what I have seen.
You may, but you have not factored in the cost to have your Juniper re-certified and your Jun-OS relicense. And for this, it might be better to go new, especially if the router is going to be your main border/edge router.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Member Area



Data Center Industry Daily News


Cloud and Dedicated Hosting


Sponsors Managed Servers Sponsored by DedicatedNOW.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.